The Dark Side of the Law

There is no Dark Side of the Law. It’s all Dark.

Comment--Protect Public Radio

I am not one prone to preaching to the masses from on high; however, this is an issue of critical importance in America.

Public Radio is under attack. Specifically, the tea-bagging austerity morons think eliminating all public funding for Public Radio will somehow balance our budget. Mind you, these are the same whores who will human centipede for corporate money.

Public Radio provides ALL VIEWPOINTS unbiased access to the national consciousness and debate. Public Radio does not have hidden corporate agendas to promote (at least while public funding is available).

Over 170 million Americans rely on Public Radio (and Public Television) each day to bring arts and education and enlightenment to everyone, especially those without satellite radio and iPads and such. Public Radio is an essential part of our intellectual growth as a society.

My son and I are huge fans of WNYC's "Radiolab". I also like "This American Life" (WBEZ in Chicago) and several "Marketplace" (American Public Media) programs. When I asked my son what he wanted to do with the portion of his 2010 allowance we require him to donate, he gave $120 to WNYC because he loves "Radiolab" THAT MUCH. 

I am not asking you to give money. All I ask is that you please complete the automated message found in the following link:

http://capwiz.com/170ma/issues/alert/?alertid=26970501

You can even customize the message if you like. Hell, tell them that The Dark Side sent you.

Please keep Public Radio for the public. Please pass along this posting or the link.

And a lonely treat for you all just for reading this post:

Comment--The Dark Side Dialogs--Volume IV: Here Comes the Son

[Volume III may be found here: http://darksidelawyer.posterous.com/comment-the-dark-side-dialogs-volume-iii-thre. A link to Volume II may be found in Volume III as well as on my Posterous home page.]

Prefatory note: Personally, in my opinion, AA is bullshit. Actually, I should clarify; AA is much like communism: sounds great, full of problems. For me, AA in practice is mostly bullshit, and AA in theory is partially bullshit. I believe 12-step programs can be extremely helpful for some people. For others, they become just another venue for espousing dogmatic tenents. In addition, the tendency for many AA programs to become intertwined with evangelical Christianity is, for me, an abrogation of some of the fundamental principles of AA. And then there are the juvenile social peccadillos that seem to plague many AA meetings. Please keep in mind that these are my personal opinions and are not meant to besmirch anyone's experiences or successes with AA or recovery or 12-step programs. And, in any event, this is not the day for excoriating AA (by now you know what's coming: other topics for other posts). With that being said, let us begin so that we may wrap up this four-part vignette.

My first encounter with AA was a meeting with another local attorney in "the program." He was 25 years my senior, and I think he had been in recovery for the past 10 years or so. I think meeting with another attorney made things a little easier for me as we had certain inherent commonalities. The meeting was lke a "lite" version of my telephone conversation with the Director. He was extremely open, frank and honest. If you thought lawyers were brutally honest at times, alcoholic lawyers level that shit up exponentially. As we wrapped up, he invited me to join him at one of his regular meetings, the legendary Wednesday night Men's Stag.

The Men's Stag was pretty much like most other AA meetings I attended subsequently, though the numbers of attendees was definitely higher. And, of course, being a Men's Stag, there were no women. Some jeanyouse came up with the idea that not having women there would enhance the experience on some level and improve the recovery process. However, remember that this was before YouPorn and RedTube, so any veiled homoeroticism had to be confined to events such as this. 

Anyway, after all of the "My name is ______ and I am a ______" introductions, we had a rousing presentation (based on passages from "The Big Book") from one of the area's more noteable speakers. Oh, and there was a period for assisting anyone who needed to have their card signed (that is, those who needed to prove to a court that they attended the requisite number of AA meetings in a specific timeframe as mandated by court order). Then, the attorney who invited me had me stand up in front of everyone so that I could get a round of applause for being so brave and so that I could receive a "chip" to commemorate X days sober. I am not a big fan of such displays, but I understood that some people find the peer validation to be an essential support mechanism, and I did not want to be rude, so I smiled, took my chip and thanked everyone.

Over the next few months, I performed all of the actions of the dutiful alcoholic. I purchased "The Big Book," "The Little Book," "The Little Red Book" and a "When and Where" guide (a listing of all regular area AA meetings). I memorized the "Serenity Prayer" and the "Lord's Prayer." I tried to go to at least two meetings a week. The Men's Stag was good as I could hit it on the way home from work. I also liked the weekly lawyers-only meeting because it was over lunch at an area family-owned steakhouse and because we could talk shop. Also, this meeting was much smaller, and the Director would show up every now and then (he really is a nice guy). The Friday midnight meeting was good as well as it was done by candlelight.

I began "working the program" and "working the steps" (although this was never my strong suit in AA, but we will cover that in another post). Most importantly, I spent a lot of time listening. Occasionally I would make comments. I even led a couple of meetings. But mostly I listened to other people and their struggles. Now, I do not want to make light of my own poor judgment when it came to alcohol, but I met a bunch of FUCKED UP people in AA that made my perodic binge drinking seem like Tuesday lunch for them. However, I was quick to recognize (and remain ever-cognizant of the fact) that the trip from my worst to their worst was a short one, indeed. Scared straight works on occasion, you know.

More importantly, I knew that my wife felt better knowing that I was sticking with my promise. Oddly enough, we never talked about AA or the "not drinking thing" in earnest very much. Maybe she just considered it a given that I knew el drink-o would result el divorce-o. Maybe she felt like she needed to give me space. Maybe she presumed I would talk to my father about AA stuff since we were both attending meetings at that time. Maybe we were just good, suburban WASPs at heart. You know, all good, suburban WASPs come with software pre-installed that allows them to act completely oblivious to uncomfortable subjects without skipping even the slightest beat. Whatever the reason, it was not much a topic for discussion at home or in mixed company, though some people would tell me how poroud they were of me going to AA (mainly relatives--my AA activities were kept anonymous professionally and socially--but only when they were at least halfway in the bag).

Ultimately, I went to AA for about a year. I stopped going for a variety of reasons. First and foremost, I found that I did not have an unquenchable desire to drink. True, when I did drink I had no desire to stop drinking until I was at Obliteration Factor 10, Mr. Sulu, but I never had the desire to run to the bottle anytime life handed me a setback. So much of what AA was geared to address did not apply to me. Second, I was getting ready to change jobs (moving to my current firm). I knew the demands on my time would be grater, and AA just was not as important as other commitments. Third, one of the attorneys at the lawyers' meeting said something about AA that really resonated with me. "At some point, your life has to be for living, not for attending AA meetings." I took that to mean recovery does you no good if all you do is talk about recovery in recovery meetings.

AA brought me no epiphanies. There were no angels singing from on high, no cracks opening before me showing the way to Hades. I did not complete more than half of the 12 steps. But, for me, I got to where I needed to be. Happy mediums and I seldom get along (hence the quote on my Posterous home page). Unfortunately, this means some people have been hurt along the way. For some, I have made amends where I deemed remedial action necessary. For others, they can still go to hell and die because that is what I deemed they deserve. But AA did help me stop drinking, so I cannot bemoan the effectiveness of AA even if I do not agree with all of its theories or practices.

I admit that I do not believe in "God" in the traditional Christian religious sense. I do believe in a higher power (a fundamental AA concept), but, for me, that higher power is far more elusive and esoteric than some guy--or gal--in a chair watching over all of us like some sadistic claymation director. In fact, my concept is even more elusive than Higgs-Boson particles or gravitons. Part of my belief in a higher power incorporates the concept of karma. And part of my belief lies in the beauty and majesty and purpose of the universe (again, without the need for even Aquinas' "First Mover").

So, yes, on some level, I do believe that things happen for a reason. If nothing else, I have some empirical evidence, though the sample size may be statistically insignificant. My wife and I had been trying to conceive for about a year and a half or so with no success. I even had to subject myself to the joys of certain urological testing (THAT will make a great post one day, especially since my "ammo" was up to specs!). Our son was conceived shortly after I stopped drinking. That is all the proof I need that I made a correct decision.

It gives me a certain degree of satisfaction and comfort to know that my son will never see me drunk. I am an irresponsible drinker and a bad drunk. Really bad. Really, REALLY bad. Certainly nothing most adults should have to endure, much less an innocent child who did not get to choose his parents. The only feeling that comes close to that satisfaction is knowing that the other little Dead Head soon to be joining Team Dark Side will be accorded the same deference and respect.

(Yes, another masterpiece from @oldglorytees! The shirt, I mean, unless all the genetic testing was mistaken. As Maury would say, "You ARE the father!")

Along that same line of thought, if I do disappear unexpectedly sometime in the next few weeks, please do not be alarmed. The absence will be temporary but, I think you will agree, necessary.

I do not know what the future will bring. Well, actually, I do know some of what the future will bring. That is why I have been intentionally continuing the December sleep-deprivation during the past six weeks. And cutting back to three days a week at the gym. Oh, and I am going to buy a shotgun so I have something to clean in my living room/driveway in about 10 or 12 years. Maybe a Bowie knife and a whetstone, too. But, whatever may come, it will be entertaining. So, please feel free to join me as I get ready to do this all over again.

[This entry is dedicated to the two who, despite our best efforts, were not fortunate enough to make it all the way. Though I never really knew you, you are and shall forever remain missed each and every day.]

Music--Catholic Girls

I'm organizing a new non-profit. Our Lady of the Sacred Beej. Gotta keep those Catholic girls naughty. 

I was kicking around two mottos:

  1. "Beejs are only venal sins."
  2. "Chimney and tailpipe are fair game in the eyes of the Lord."

Any takers?

(courtesy of The Central Scrutinizer)

Comment--The Dark Side Dialogs--Volume III: John Barleycorn Must Die

[Volume II may be found here: http://darksidelawyer.posterous.com/comment-the-dark-side-dialogs-volume-ii-threa. A link to Volume I may be found in Volume II as well as on my Posterous home page.]

 

May 27, 1999, 11:30 AM

Okay, maybe I was being a little disingenuous with my intentions. On some level, I thought that I would be able to feign some contrition, act like the remorseful, petulant puppy for a bit and then get out of the dog house, eventually weasel my way back into the "main house" and return to business as usual (for the most part). Hate all you want, but I did not think that I had a significant problem. Rather, I just had a bad night. Plus, this was back when I though Pet rose still had a shot of getting into the Hall.

You see, I was not an everyday drinker. My drinking was confined almost exclusively to weekends, with the occasional weeknight event (such as the golf outing). Also, there were many weekends where I only drank on one of the two nights. I was much more adult with my drinking than I had been a scant six or seven years earlier. But those are other stories for other posts. Regardless, I was not one of those "three-martini" lawyers of yesteryear who got sloshed at lunch and then faked it back at the office until happy hour. That would be...uncivilized.

However, my own personal rationalizations aside, I needed to do something to make up for the prior evening and for other recent instances of drinking malfeasance. And that something needed to be somewhat grandiose. Luckily, I had a blackbelt in going through the motions which had allowed me to escape inordinate amounts of accountability and responsibility to date. And I had the perfect patsy in mind.

 

May 27, 1999, 11:45 AM

The number was not hard to find. There were "ads" in the monthly State Bar Magazine, and occasionally a feature article would run therein. Also, the annual "meat book" (a/k/a the State Bar Directory) had a listing in the Administrative section and additional "ads" throughout. Evidently, lawyers have a disproportionate occurrece of chemical dependency and mental disorders (I know, right??). As a result, like most others, our State Bar Association has established a Lawyers' Assistance Program. That is, we have a dedicated group of individuals, some of whom are available 24-7-365, ready, willing and able (not to mention clinically trained) to help, whether it means lending an ear, providing information or even performing intervention services.

I must admit that I was kind of nervous when I called. Admitting weakness has never been a strong suit, even when a tactical move as part of a grander scheme. However, they must have know of my VIP status, because I was put through to the Director without any issue. I hemmed and hawed a bit, maybe even hedged a little, but eventually I was able to spit it out. "I need to talk to someone to see if I have a problem with drinking." Okay, no trumpets blaring; no quartet riding down the sreet on horseback--not the end of the world. So far so good.

 

The Director broke the ice by telling me about himself. He was (and still is) a lawyer. He was (and still is) an alcoholic/addict. He was (and still is) a licensed recovery and intervention specialist.

Editor's Note: There is a certain degree of debate within the acloholic/addict recovery community as to whether use of "recovering" acloholic or "recovering" addict is more accurate. I will address "recovery" separately in greater detail. Suffice it to say, brevity being the soul of wit, I do not use the qualifier in parlance. Also, I like to think of it the same way I do about organized religion. Most people do not say "non-practicing" Catholic. Or "non-practicing" hedonist. So nyah.

So, after speaking for a bit, he then turned the discussion back to me. I described my drinking habits and patterns, constantly qualifying that I never drank whil working, I never missed work obligations because of drinking, et aliaet cetera, et tu, Brute. He let me go on uninterrupted for a bit (classic Dark Side tactic), then he moved in like a trained assassin. "You've told me about your drinking not affecting your work, and that's great. Your license is safe. What you haven't told me is (a) how your drinking affects your home life and (b) what motivated you to call me now." Left hook, right uppercut--both square on the jaw. Cus D'Amato would have been proud of him.

 

So I recounted the gory details from the night before. And the Sword of Damocles perilously perched over my pecker, if not my head. Obviously he has heard this song before. A little light cross-examination with kid gloves elicited admissions of an increasing frequency of blackout-style binge drinking over the past six to 12 months. Oddly enough, this was right about the time I started drinking martinis. 

On par with Manhattans--a drink that even Keith fucking Richards finds repulsive--martinis are the ultimate drinker's drink. Gin (or vodka, if you are a fucking pussy), vermouth (optional) and bitters (mandatory, unless you are a uckiung pussy). Note that only truly hardcore drinkers will go to the trouble of using Angostura bitters with their martinis. And Bombay Sapphire was my preferred poison, though I was not beneath drinking Tanquerray or even Seagrams in a pinch. Go fucking big or stay fucking home. In fact, my wife was the one who bought me the martini "cookbook" and a mixer set as a gift, so she gets at least an honorable mention enabler credit on some level. My favorite recipie was the Winston Churchill: 6 oz. dry gin, pour in shaker over ice, wave the bottle of vermouth over the shaker (without pouring any out!), cover, shake, pour and drink. Repeat. And I had a BIG martini glass set. I could easily get a 10 oz. martini in one of those. I would at least maintain the facade and sip the first one. The subsequent offerings went down much more quickly.

While talking with the Director, I had a small epiphany. I did not enjoy BEING drunk as much as I enjoyed GETTING drunk. The sting of the first swallow. The creeping body buzz. The lightheadedness. The crescendo of conversation. The irrational arguments and reconciliations. The whole damn process. Unfortunately, the GETTING and the BEING were becoming inextricably intertwined. I was consuming so much during the GETTING that the BEING was becoming a foregone conclusion, so much so that the enjoyment of the GETTING was fading. And forget about stopping when in the midst. If I was only going to have one or two, I would not even bother. I just saw no point in half-assing the job. But I always was a gunner.

A gunner who really DID have a problem.

 

May 27, 1999, 12:45 PM

"So, what do you want to do? This is your life, and this is your decision. If you want additional help, I have some names and numbers that I can give you. You don't have to go through any of this alone. You can talk this over with your wife first if you prefer."

Fuck me running. It would have been so much easier if he had said I was obviously off my rocker, the men with the white coats and the backwards jacket were en route and I was going to get a nice little break. Three squares a day, group chats, visitation days and the like. But noooooooooo. That would have been too fucking easy. I guess some penance was due for the suffering I had inflicted upon others.

 

"Also, I can assure you that all of this can be as confidential as you like. No one will know about this call, and no one has to know about any recovery services in which you elect to partake." At the time, one of my specialties was employment law, so I was well aware of my rights.

I paused. I think I forgot to breathe. Or perhaps I was truly in the moment, and special relativity was kind enough to essentially stop time around me. Not one to shy from melodramatics, the monumental nature of the prospect of closing a circle was not lost on me. It was almost five years ago when I had sat down with my father and told him that he was going to get help for his drinking "or else." Again, more stories for other posts. Could this really be happening to me? And could I somehow end up winning by admitting defeat?

May 27, 1999, 3:03 PM

"Real help. I mean like clinical help. I called Lawyers' Assistance. I'm going to go to AA."